Doris
Wingender said that Franziska had been a lodger in her mother's home
until her disappearance in March 1920. Over two years later, during the
summer of 1922, Doris reported, Franziska had suddenly returned and
said that she had been living with a number of Russian monarchist
families "who apparently mistook her for someone else." Franziska had
stayed for three days, Doris continued, and while she was there, the
two women had exchanged clothing: Franziska took from Doris a dark blue
suit....she handed over a mauve dress, some monogrammed underwear, and
a camel's hair coat. Then, once again, Franzkisa vanished.
To
verify the story ,the newspaper hired a detective, Martin Knopf, who
took the clothing Franziska had left behind at the Wingenders' to one
of the Russian emigre households where Fraulein U. had stayed in 1922.
Baron and Baroness von Kleist recognized it. "I bought the camel's hair
myself." said the baron, "That's the underwear I monogrammed myself"
cried the baroness. For the benefit of the newspapers, the "Riddle of
Anastasia" was solved.[1]
While it does go on to say she had
called the newspaper herself with the story and wanted to sell it, I
don't accept as the Anderson camp does that this meant she was lying.
The clothes prove she wasn't lying. Of course she wanted money, she was
poor, and she thought she could get money out of being part of a famous
case. Who wouldn't? It doesn't mean she lied. If she was going to lie
in order to set AA up at FS, she wouldn't have given the accounts of
her being 'stocky and big boned' [2]because at that time AA wasn't (maybe
she had been before the TB?)
So
what do we make of this episode of Franziska briefy returning to her true identity? Was she growing weary of her role and
wanted to go back to being herself? Did she want to see if anyone would
remember her as her former self? Did she have a silly lapse of reason
not realizing how this may have destroyed her claim, or was she so
mentally unstable she didn't even consider the consequences? This
incident came very close to getting her busted and ruining her claim.
It
was decided there should be an official meeting between Doris and Anna,
so Doris was driven to Castle Seeon, where Anna was staying with the
Leuchtenbergs, to face her. This took place April 5,1927 and was in the Berlin newspaper the next day. Here is the account of a writer for the
paper:
...
Mrs. Tchiakovsky (AA) faced with charges of assuming a false identity,
had no choice. According to a writer for the Berlin Nachtausgabe, who
was present with Martin Knopf, this is what happened:
The
witness, Fr. Doris Wingender, enters the room. Franziska Schanzkowska
lies on the divan, her face half covered with a blanket. The witness
has barely said 'good day' before FS jerks up and cries in a heavily
accented voice "That THING must get out!" The sudden agitation, the
wild rage in her voice, the horror in her eyes, leave no doubt, she has
recognized Wingender.
Wingender stands as if turned to stone.
She has immediately recognized the lady on the divan as FS. That is the
same face she saw day after day for four years. That is the same voice,
the same nervous trick with the handkerchief, that is the same
Franziska Schanzkowksa.[3]
"I can swear it! I can swear it!" Doris cried out as she left.[3a]
Faith
Lavington, an English governess to the Leuchtenberg children who had
been tutoring Anderson in English, was in attendance at the meeting and
wrote in her diary that she found the claimant's reaction extremely
suspicious. "Why would
anyone treat an unknown person in such a fashion? She didn't seem to
trouble about the two men (reporter and detective) but focused only on
the woman." One of the
Leuchtenberg daughters confessed to Faith that, though she had accused
the detective of 'faking' the photograph of Franziska, her heart sank
because the likeness to Anna was unmistakable. [4]
Some Anderson supporters, then and now, claim that
Doris' s credibility is tainted because she was to receive payment from
the newspaper if the story turned out to be true [5] As the story goes, she walked into the office of the Berlin Nachtausgabe and said, "I've got some information about your "Anastasia", how much is it worth to you?" [6] But
honestly, just because she was to profit from the story does not mean
she was lying or part of an anti-AA conspiracy as devotees have tried
to paint her. Think of it from her point of view-we've already seen how
bad things were in Germany during that time period, and Doris had never
been a woman of means in any economy. She opened up the newspaper one
day and sees before her very eyes a picture of Franziska, and realizes
that she is apparently the only person who has the key to unlock and
solve the most popular and intriguing mystery of the time, what a stroke
of good luck! Of course she would feel she deserved to be paid for this
information she possessed Also, it's natural that the newspaper would
only pay up if the story were true, otherwise, they'd have people
giving them all kinds of untrue stories trying to collect money they
didn't deserve. Of course they'd wait and see if she was right before
they paid her. The money they offered was about a years' salary for her. Accepting money for a story does not mean it's false, it
means it must be that much more true and valuable in print as an
interesting product. Even today, people sell information to tabloids
and magazines about famous people and are paid for it. Even a wealthy
person would expect to be paid for such a story. This does not damage
Doris's credibility, especially since Anderson did turn out to be
Franziska.
It was from Harriet Rathlef's series of stories on "Anastasia" that Wingender had seen and recognized her photo and come forward. Of course the newspaper was excited about this new information because they knew from Rathlef's series that Anna had indeed been missing a couple of days back in 1922, [7] when she had been found at the Berlin Zoo. Naturally they'd want to be the paper to 'break the story' of the 'unmasking' of the royal imposter. The paper got a bank detective, Martin Knopf, to investigate the case. It was later learned that Grand Duke Ernst of Hesse, "Uncle Ernie", had paid for the whole thing, and the paper only published what was found. [8] Ernst had said solving the case was like a huge stone had been lifted from his heart.[9] On April 8, 1928, the Berlin Police officially accepted Anna was Franziska:
Hess. Polizeiamten Darmstadt, 20.5.27
"Erkennungsdienst" [Identification Service]
"Referring to the so-called Anastasia of Russia"
"From the Berlin daily report ["Tagesbericht"] No. 32 of 20.4.27 it is signed and signified officially as established that the identity of the `Unbekannte' has been completely assured as being that of Franziska Schanzkowska by the `Kriminalzentrale' of Darmstadt.
"All of this has been taken up and accepted by the police
[10]
Anna's champion Harriet Rathlef, not willing to give up. She also alleged that the real Franziska had been killed by a gang of criminals, but later retracted.[11] This is an example of just how far she'd go with known false information to keep her character's story alive. She sent her own detective to the Berlin Police dept., and found they did indeed consider the case closed. [12] So, if they had her, why wasn't she charged with fraud? There are some quotes of reports saying she was going to be charged
with fraud, but sources 'very high up' [13] had it stopped. Was this
true? Who was it, and why? This has caused much speculation over the years, with theories ranging from the Bolsheviks to the royals. But it could be as simple as what one newspaper employee said "We do not care about making it hard for this girl." [14] Maybe all anyone really wanted was for it all to be solved and done with. It was good enough for them that they had an answer. Unfortunately, this would not be the
end of it, and things got much bigger and far worse in the years to come.
While she did lose a few backers, most of her supporters never did accept she was Franziska, and were determined to continue to believe it was all a scam made up and paid for by Uncle Ernie to get rid of her because she knew about his alleged trip to Russia. Anna's supporters, both then and for years to come, would
spread rumors of conspiracies, setups, payoffs, anything crooked
connected to the investigation and identification of Anna as Franziska,
to avoid the truth that their "Anastasia" had been found out. Her fans referred to the incident as the "Schanzkowska legend" or "myth". Sadly for
Ernie, his heart was never to be free from that stone for the rest of
his life, and even to this day, he is villanized by Anderson
supporters who try to say he cruelly denied his niece for greed and
self preservation.[15] Only the DNA would finally exonorate him, but even
that hasn't stopped the conspiracy theories. If only her claim had been stopped back then,
so many would have been spared so much pain and trouble.
After all this, she was officially left with the 'identity'
not of Franziska, or Anastasia, but Frau Tchiakovsky, a made-up name
based on a fictional husband. (she would later be known as Anna
Anderson) Gilliard was furious that just as she was about to be unmasked as Franziska, Gleb Botkin took her to America,[16] where a whole new set of prospects and supporters would come into play. She would never have an official identity until she married John Manahan in 1968.
